Fidelity MyPlan: Should Good Savers Invest Less Aggressively?

Fidelity has a new tool called the myPlan retirement calculator. It’s very soothing and is only 5 questions long, why not give it a whirl? What I like about it is that it doesn’t just deal with average numbers. People like to use round numbers like 8% annually and pretend like they are a sure thing, but the fact is with some bad timing we could end up doing a lot worse.

Using some rough numbers from our own situation – age 28, $100k income, $100k saved so far, $2,500 saved monthly, Aggressive Growth investment style, we get the following result:

myPlan Screenshot

Not bad, right? If the market performs on average, we will easily exceed what we need to retire on. (Yes, the numbers are huge!) If the market performs poorly however, we’ll be significantly short. Now, what if we change the investment style from Aggressive to Conservative?
[Read more…]

February 2007 Investment Portfolio Snapshot

It’s time for another bi-monthly update on my investment portfolio.

2/07 Portfolio Breakdown
 
Retirement Portfolio
Fund $ %
FSTMX – Fidelity Total Stock Market Index Fund $11,212 15%
VIVAX – Vanguard [Large-Cap] Value Index $14,057 19%
VISVX – V. Small-Cap Value Index $14,184 19%
VGSIX – V. REIT Index $9,781 13%
VTRIX – V. International Value $8,052 11%
VEIEX – V. Emerging Markets Stock Index $7,814 10%
VFICX – V. Int-Term Investment-Grade Bond $7,631 10%
BRSIX – Bridgeway Ultra-Small Market $2,109 3%
Cash – Unreinvested Dividends $500
Total $75,340
 
December and January Fund Transactions
$500 deposited in 401k, not yet invested

Thoughts
Another two months with little activity in my low-maintenance portfolio. I don’t get the joy of reading about my fund picks in magazines, but I don’t worry about choosing the wrong one either.

I am still ironing out a slightly tweaked asset allocation, one that has a more balanced domestic/international distribution and something I hopefully won’t mess with again for a long time. I’m reviewing the model portfolio comparisons and the books they came from, including Ferri’s new book All About Index Funds.

You can see some older posts on how this portfolio came to be here, as well as my previous portfolio snapshots here.

Starting Your Own Portfolio Out With Limited Funds

All of these suggested portfolios were developed by smart people who did their homework. But none of them are the same! This is because every single one also made compromises based on their interpretation of current research, simplicity, availability of suitable investments, costs, and also to some measure their overall predictions of the future. We have to do the same thing on our end.

For example, many people are starting with smaller amounts. Some of these model portfolios have 8 funds or more! Just by the fund minimums alone, you’d be looking at a minimum balance of $24,000 or so. And even then, you’d be looking a various low balance and maintenance fees. So what do you to minimize fees? Here are a few ideas:

1) Buy an all-in-one fund, and split it up later. Since many fund companies have all-in-one target-dated funds, you can simply buy one of these until you have enough to split into other funds. Here are some specific fund suggestions, starting at only $50 per month. The fund’s asset allocation may not be exactly what you want, but it will be well-diversified, and still much better than other high-cost alternatives. Here’s what the Vanguard Target 2045 Fund looks like:

Vanguard Target 2045 Breakdown

I built up about $50,000 in Vanguard Target funds (VTIVX and VTTHX) before splitting it up into 8 funds last year. Since they were held in IRAs/401ks, I didn’t have to worry about any tax consequences. This choice is my favorite because it’s the most simple – just buy the same fund for a few years!
[Read more…]

Model Portfolio #6: Merriman’s FundAdvice Ultimate Buy and Hold

(This is the sixth in my series of Model Portfolio Comparisons.)

Paul Merriman also runs his own money management firm. He also writes at FundAdvice.com, which has a lot of interesting articles about investing in no-load mutual funds, with and without market timing. Here is the breakdown of their “Vanguard balanced buy-and-hold portfolio”.

Fundadvice Model Portfolio Breakdown

Asset Allocation For 60% Stocks/40% Bonds
6% S&P 500
6% US Large Value
6% US Small
6% US Small Value
6% REIT
12% International Developed (Pacific + Europe)
12% Int’l Value
6% Emerging Markets
20% Intermediate Term Bonds
12% Short Term Bonds
8% Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS)

They have other suggested buy-and-hold portfolios for different brokerages, which vary slightly but are still very similar. I find it interesting that the stock portion is perfectly 50/50 domestic/international.

Model Portfolio #5: A Random Walk Down Wall Street

(This is the fifth in my series of Model Portfolio Comparisons.)

First written in 1973, Burton Malkiel’s A Random Walk Down Wall Street (my review) has become an investing classic, pioneering the controversial idea that stock prices are random and thus a monkey throwing darts would be just accurate as any stock-picker. Below is a recommended asset allocation from the book for an investor in their “mid-twenties”.

Bold Investor Model Portfolio

Asset Allocation Pie Chart, A Random Walk Down Wall Street

Asset Allocation for suggested 75% Stocks/25% Bonds ratio
43% Total US Stock Market
22% Total International Stock Market
10% REIT
20% Treasuries/TIPS/High-Quality Corporate Bonds
5% Cash

This breakdown looks very similar to the basic “Early Saver” portfolio from All About Asset Allocation. See the rest of the model portfolios for example mutual funds and ETFs for each asset classes.

As you age, the recommended percentage of stocks goes down to 65% at age 40 and 40% in late retirement. It is interesting to note that while Malkiel consistently recommends real estate as part of your portfolio, REITs were not explicitly included in the recommended portfolios until recently. I noticed this when comparing my personal copy (published in 1996) to the most recent edition. I’m guessing the growing availability of index funds that track REITs is the reason behind this.

Model Portfolio #4: The Intelligent Asset Allocator

(This is the fourth in my series of Model Portfolio Comparisons.)

I hope people aren’t getting overwhelmed by all of these portfolios. Remember, the law of diminishing returns applies to investment complexity as well. After a while, adding more asset classes and mutual funds doesn’t get you that much more expected return. If you’re getting bored, try some of the earlier portfolios and tune out the rest. Personally, I don’t mind having 8 funds or so, and I’ve found that after the initial setup the maintenance is pretty minimal.

William Bernstein, both a neurologist and a founder of his own money management firm, is the author of the challenging but information-packed book The Intelligent Asset Allocator (my review). Here is one model portfolio for those that desire moderate complexity and high risk. The author warns that while this asset allocation has very high expected long-term returns, it will behave much differently than the S&P 500 fund that many people use as benchmarks.

Bold Investor Model Portfolio

Asset Allocation Pie Chart, Bold Investor

Asset Allocation for 70% Stocks/30% Bonds ratio
[Read more…]

Model Portfolio #3: All About Asset Allocation

(This is the third in my series of Model Portfolio Comparisons.)

All About Asset Allocation (my review) is written by Richard Ferri, CFA, who is also the president of his own investment advisory service. If you are interested in learning more about how each asset class interacts with one another, I definitely recommend this book. Here are two model portfolios for younger investor, one simple and one more complex.

“Early Saver” Model Portfolio – Basic

Asset Allocation Pie Chart, Basic

Asset Allocation for 70% Stocks/30% Bonds ratio
40% Total US Stock Market
20% Total International Stock Market
10% REIT
30% Intermediate-Term Bonds

“Early Saver” Model Portfolio – Slice-and-Dice
[Read more…]

Mutual Fund and ETF Asset Class Definitions: Stocks

What do all these asset classes in the model portfolio comparisons mean, anyways? Total Market? Large-Cap? Value? One big hurdle is that there are no set definitions for any of these classes, and each individual mutual fund can and will use it’s own interpretation. But let’s try anyways, starting with equities.

Market capitalization
Often simply referred to as “cap”, this is the company’s value as determined by multiplying the number of outstanding shares of stock by the current market price for one share.

Total US Stock Market
While the definition seems self-explanatory, there a bunch of different benchmarks used to track the entire domestic stock market on a cap-weighted basis. These all try to represent the roughly 5,000 companies currently being publicly-traded on major domestic stock exchanges.

Total International Stock Market
This theoretically includes all publicly-traded companies headquartered outside the US. As of 2005 this was over 20,000 companies, and tracking all of them is no easy feat.

The international stock market is further broken down into Developed and Emerging markets based on per-capita GDP and the maturity of the country’s stock markets. Examples of developed markets include Canada, Australia, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom. Examples of emerging markets include Russia, China, South Africa, and Turkey.

Further dividing both domestic and international markets are size and style considerations.

Size Classifications – Large Cap / Mid Cap / Small Cap / Micro Cap
These are tough to define, as they change over time and people rarely agree completely anyways. Here’s how they look graphically as percentages of the market cap in their geographic area:1

Asset Class Size

By total value, here’s roughly how they break down:2
[Read more…]

Calculate Your Exact 2006/2007 Portfolio Rate Of Return

I sensed that people weren’t quite satisfied with my Rate of Return Estimation Calculator. After wasting lots of time trying to program the internal-rate-of-return (IRR) function myself, I realized I could simply embed an online spreadsheet. Ain’t technology grand?

The spreadsheets below will do all the exact calculations for you. I made one for 2006 and one for calculating your ongoing year-to-date and annualized returns in 2007. You will need to supply the date and amount of all deposits and withdrawals in your accounts. If you reinvested dividends then those can be ignored and rolled into the return.

Calculate Your 2006 Portfolio Return

[Read more…]

Model Portfolio #1: Couch Potato Portfolio

(This is the first in my series of Model Portfolio Comparisons.)

The Couch Potato Portfolio is the invention of Scott Burns, a personal finance columnist at the Dallas Morning News. Originally, the portfolio consisted of just two funds – the Vanguard S&P 500 Index Fund (VFINX) and the Vanguard Total Bond Index Fund (VTBMX). That was over 15 years ago, and it has beaten most balanced funds in the meantime. The current version is below.

Asset Allocation (All Ages)
50% Total US Stock Market
50% US Inflation-Indexed Securities.

Pie Chart for Couch Potato Portfolio

There are many ways that people find fault with this portfolio – low stock allocation, no risk adjustment with time, no international exposure, no REIT fund. Partially in response to these, Burns has also introduced other variations like the Margarita Portfolio and Four Square Portfolio. The Margarita Portfolio is 33% Total US Stock Market, 33% Total International Stock Market, and 34% Inflation Protected Securities. But still, you can’t beat the simplicity.

Model Retirement/Investment Portfolios: A Comparison

In my rough guide to investing, I suggested some all-in-one mutual funds for beginners. But what if you want to go a step further and design your own portfolio? Or you have a 401k with only limited choices?

Of course, the best answer is always to read some good books. But another idea I’ve been meaning to do for a while is to collect the model portfolios from lots of different reputable books and sources and compare them to each other. You won’t see any individual stock picks here, all the sources will be based (at least loosely) upon modern portfolio theory and thus focus on optimizing the risk/reward ratio using proper asset allocation.

I think it should go without saying that since these are model portfolios, they are imperfect by design and at most should serve as rough guidelines for your own investing. Everyone has a different time horizons and situations. Use them as one part of your own research.

One way to tailor these portfolios to your own use is to adjust the stock/bond ratio according to how aggressive you wish to be. Accordingly, I have tried to separate the stock and bond components.

Completed Model Portfolios

  1. Couch Potato Portfolio
  2. Boglehead’s Guide To Investing
  3. All About Asset Allocation
  4. The Intelligent Asset Allocator
  5. A Random Walk Down Wall Street
  6. FundAdvice.com by Merriman
  7. Unconventional Success by Swensen
  8. Columnist Ben Stein

Future Model Portfolios (in progress)

Here are the remaining sources that I have in mind so far. Please feel free to suggest others.

  • The Four Pillars of Investing by Bernstein (Review)
  • Common Sense on Mutual Funds by Bogle (Review)
  • The Informed Investor by Armstrong (Review)
  • Index Funds: The 12-Step Program for Active Investors by Hebner (Review)
  • Coffeehouse Portfolio by Schultheis

This index of posts has been added to my Rough Guide To Investing.

Why You Should Ignore Stock Market Predictions

The Motley Fool used to be a great resource for investing, espousing index funds and low-cost investing, but it is gradually becoming just a factory that churns out stock tip newsletters. Last January, they made some Stock Predictions for 2006.

Read the predictions first, or at least skim the excerpts below. Which do you agree with?

#1: Shares of Google will fall in 2006

Wall Street didn’t want to buy into Google when it went public at $85, but now that the stock trades five times higher that that, bears are hard to come by. The humbled market mavens have responded with higher price targets, but gravity always seems to be just a disappointing quarter away.

#2: Both XM and Sirius will close out 2006 higher

Just as your cable bills creep higher every year, XM and Sirius will likely be charging more in the future. Tack on premium offerings and next-generation receivers that will blow the earnings potential through the roof — by allowing for everything from digital downloads to immediate responses to sponsored pitches — and I really believe that in five to 10 years, a lot of the bears will be licking their self-inflicted wounds for missing this obvious play into a promising duopoly.

#3: TiVo will bounce back

I’m expecting TiVo shares to bounce back dramatically, possibly even into the double digits. I still believe that TiVo — rich in brand, patents, and daydreams — will find a way to matter in a form that investors will find attractive. Cool companies never die without a fight.

#4: Six Flags will be one of the top stocks of 2006

With shares of Six Flags trading in the double digits for the first time in nearly four years, the market seems to be willing to give Dan Snyder and ESPN prodigy Mark Shapiro better than a fighting chance to turn the regional amusement-park operator around.

The stock may have tripled since bottoming out last year, but that doesn’t mean the value of the company has tripled. This is an important distinction to make. Because the company’s balance sheet is packing $2.1 billion in debt, the enterprise value of Six Flags has actually risen by just a little better than 50% to $3.5 billion. That’s the beauty of leverage in a turnaround situation: The stock can double here in 2006, growing sixfold in two years, yet the company’s enterprise value will have only doubled in that time.

Now, if you tracked these stocks this year you may already know which were right…
[Read more…]